Brad Wilcox, The Continuous Atonement
After reading this chapter heading, I just sat there and thought. Truly thought about what this would be like, to only have the bread or the water during the sacrament. What would it be like to only have the gift of one and not the other?
With only the bread, if Christ had only died for us and been resurrected, that's all we would have. Sure, it's a fun thought to think, just like in Tuck Everlasting, that, "I can live forever!" We would become immortal, but to what end? None of us would ever be in the presence of God again, ever. He cannot look on sin with the least degree of allowance, and without the sacrifice of Christ's blood for us, justice would never be met and there would be no mercy to let us be with them again. I don't like the thought of living forever in sin...
So then, that means having the water would be the better option, right?
If we just had the water, the blood of Christ shed for our sins, we would be allowed to have our sins forgiven of us. Sounds great right? No more living in sin, so long as we repented. But that's the only thing we would get. What would be the point of that since we would eventually just die and cease to exist anyway? Without being able to live forever, we would see God again for a few brief moments before no longer existing, or just starting this earthly process all over again. Either one is just as bad as not having had the water but only the bread to begin with...
This is why we need them both. This is why it's not only important that Christ suffered for us in Gethsemane, not only that he died for us, but also that he rose again. All three of these are key to living with God again. Without all of them, we receive nothing worth wanting. True happiness would be impossible and unattainable... But with these gifts from Christ, not only are they possible, but we can each make it back home.
No comments:
Post a Comment